Midpoint Regularization: from High Uncertainty Training to Conservative Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label Smoothing (LS) improves model generalization through penalizing models from generating overconfident output distributions. For each training sample the LS strategy smooths the one-hot encoded training signal by distributing its distribution mass over the non-ground truth classes. We extend this technique by considering example pairs, coined PLS. PLS first creates midpoint samples by averaging random sample pairs and then learns a smoothing distribution during training for each of these midpoint samples, resulting in midpoints with high uncertainty labels for training. We empirically show that PLS significantly outperforms LS, achieving up to 30% of relative classification error reduction. We also visualize that PLS produces very low winning softmax scores for both in and out of distribution samples.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2021.
Builds on
28 of 30 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
16 more
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
- 2019Variational Information Distillation for Knowledge Transfercited by 321
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2020Self-Distillation Amplifies Regularization in Hilbert Spacecited by 171
- 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
- 2017Batch Renormalization: Towards Reducing Minibatch Dependence in Batch-Normalized Modelscited by 127
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2016Towards better decoding and language model integration in sequence to sequence modelscited by 100
- 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 82
- 2017Learning from Between-class Examples for Deep Sound Recognitioncited by 53
- 2018Knowledge Distillation in Generations: More Tolerant Teachers Educate Better Studentscited by 50
- 2016DisturbLabel: Regularizing CNN on the Loss Layercited by 41
- 2019Revisiting Knowledge Distillation via Label Smoothing Regularizationcited by 29
- 2020Regularization via Structural Label Smoothingcited by 29
- 2019Viewpoint-Aware Loss with Angular Regularization for Person Re-Identificationcited by 22
- 2019MixUp as Directional Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
3 papers.