Semi-supervised multiple testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An important limitation of standard multiple testing procedures is that the null distribution should be known. Here, we consider a null distribution-free approach for multiple testing in the following semi-supervised setting: the user does not know the null distribution, but has at hand a sample drawn from this null distribution. In practical situations, this null training sample (NTS) can come from previous experiments, from a part of the data under test, from specific simulations, or from a sampling process. In this work, we present theoretical results that handle such a framework, with a focus on the false discovery rate (FDR) control and the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure. First, we provide upper and lower bounds for the FDR of the BH procedure based on empirical p-values. These bounds match when α (n+1)/m is an integer, where n is the NTS sample size and m is the number of tests. Second, we give a power analysis for that procedure suggesting that the price to pay for ignoring the null distribution is low when n is sufficiently large in front of m; namely ngtrsim m/(max(1,k)), where k denotes the number of ``detectable'' alternatives. Third, to complete the picture, we also present a negative result that evidences an intrinsic transition phase to the general semi-supervised multiple testing problem and shows that the empirical BH method is optimal in the sense that its performance boundary follows this transition phase. Our theoretical properties are supported by numerical experiments, which also show that the delineated boundary is of correct order without further tuning any constant. Finally, we demonstrate that our work provides a theoretical ground for standard practice in astronomical data analysis, and in particular for the procedure proposed in citeOrigin2020 for galaxy detection.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 66
- 2022Integrative conformal p-values for powerful out-of-distribution testing with labeled outlierscited by 19
- 2022Adaptive novelty detection with false discovery rate guaranteecited by 14
- 2023Conformal link prediction for false discovery rate controlcited by 9
- 2025Conformal Data Contamination Tests for In-distribution Data Acquisitioncited by 1
- 2025Reliable Inference in Edge-Cloud Model Cascades via Conformal Alignmentcited by 1
- 2025On the Adversarial Robustness of Learning-based Conformal Novelty Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Reliable Inference in Edge-Cloud Model Cascades via Conformal Alignment20 Oct 2025
- 2025On the Adversarial Robustness of Learning-based Conformal Novelty Detection1 Oct 2025
- 2025Conformal Data Contamination Tests for In-distribution Data Acquisition18 Jul 2025
- 2023Conformal link prediction for false discovery rate control26 Jun 2023
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-values4 Oct 2022
- 2022Integrative conformal p-values for powerful out-of-distribution testing with labeled outliers23 Aug 2022
- 2022Adaptive novelty detection with false discovery rate guarantee13 Aug 2022