mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AIT-QA: Question Answering Dataset over Complex Tables in the Airline Industry

arXiv 2106.12944 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 44

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in transformers have enabled Table Question Answering (Table QA) systems to achieve high accuracy and SOTA results on open domain datasets like WikiTableQuestions and WikiSQL. Such transformers are frequently pre-trained on open-domain content such as Wikipedia, where they effectively encode questions and corresponding tables from Wikipedia as seen in Table QA dataset. However, web tables in Wikipedia are notably flat in their layout, with the first row as the sole column header. The layout lends to a relational view of tables where each row is a tuple. Whereas, tables in domain-specific business or scientific documents often have a much more complex layout, including hierarchical row and column headers, in addition to having specialized vocabulary terms from that domain. To address this problem, we introduce the domain-specific Table QA dataset AIT-QA (Airline Industry Table QA). The dataset consists of 515 questions authored by human annotators on 116 tables extracted from public U.S. SEC filings (publicly available at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml) of major airline companies for the fiscal years 2017-2019. We also provide annotations pertaining to the nature of questions, marking those that require hierarchical headers, domain-specific terminology, and paraphrased forms. Our zero-shot baseline evaluation of three transformer-based SOTA Table QA methods - TaPAS (end-to-end), TaBERT (semantic parsing-based), and RCI (row-column encoding-based) - clearly exposes the limitation of these methods in this practical setting, with the best accuracy at just 51.8% (RCI). We also present pragmatic table preprocessing steps used to pivot and project these complex tables into a layout suitable for the SOTA Table QA models.

Key facts. Cited by 44 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 37 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  4. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  5. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  6. 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 402
  7. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  8. 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 263
  9. 2021FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answeringcited by 174
  10. 2020Open Question Answering over Tables and Textcited by 163
  11. 2016Neural Symbolic Machines: Learning Semantic Parsers on Freebase with Weak Supervisioncited by 101
  12. 2021Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrievalcited by 74
7 more
  1. 2018Memory Augmented Policy Optimization for Program Synthesis and Semantic Parsingcited by 57
  2. 2021Capturing Row and Column Semantics in Transformer Based Question Answering over Tablescited by 31
  3. 2018Ad Hoc Table Retrieval using Semantic Similaritycited by 21
  4. 2016TabMCQ: A Dataset of General Knowledge Tables and Multiple-choice Questionscited by 18
  5. 2017Content-Based Table Retrieval for Web Queriescited by 8
  6. 2017Scientific Table Search Using Keyword Queriescited by 6
  7. 2019Schemaless Queries over Document Tables with Dependenciescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 9; 2025: 19; 2026: 7.

44 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 347
  2. 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 157
  3. 2024TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answeringcited by 127
  4. 2022MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Datacited by 120
  5. 2024SpreadsheetBench: Towards Challenging Real World Spreadsheet Manipulationcited by 100
  6. 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
  7. 2024SPIQA: A Dataset for Multimodal Question Answering on Scientific Paperscited by 75
  8. 2024Multimodal Table Understandingcited by 43
  9. 2022A Survey on Table Question Answering: Recent Advancescited by 41
  10. 2024A Survey of Table Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 29
  11. 2023Large Language Models are Complex Table Parserscited by 28
  12. 2024GraphOTTER: Evolving LLM-based Graph Reasoning for Complex Table Question Answeringcited by 18
32 more
  1. 2024TQA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Table Question Answeringcited by 17
  2. 2025TableEval: A Real-World Benchmark for Complex, Multilingual, and Multi-Structured Table Question Answeringcited by 14
  3. 2022End-to-End Table Question Answering via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 12
  4. 2025RealHiTBench: A Comprehensive Realistic Hierarchical Table Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Table Analysiscited by 12
  5. 2022Parameter-Efficient Abstractive Question Answering over Tables or Textcited by 11
  6. 2025NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tablescited by 8
  7. 2024Table Question Answering for Low-resourced Indic Languagescited by 7
  8. 2025General Table Question Answering via Answer-Formula Joint Generationcited by 7
  9. 2025Granite Embedding R2 Modelscited by 7
  10. 2022Optimization Techniques for Unsupervised Complex Table Reasoning via Self-Training Frameworkcited by 6
  11. 2025Visual-TableQA: Open-Domain Benchmark for Reasoning over Table Imagescited by 6
  12. 2025Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table Understandingcited by 6
  13. 2025TabularMath: Understanding Math Reasoning over Tables with Large Language Modelscited by 5
  14. 2025T2R-bench: A Benchmark for Generating Article-Level Reports from Real World Industrial Tablescited by 5
  15. 2025TABLET: A Large-Scale Dataset for Robust Visual Table Understandingcited by 5
  16. 2026Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluationcited by 5
  17. 2022NAPG: Non-Autoregressive Program Generation for Hybrid Tabular-Textual Question Answeringcited by 4
  18. 2025TableDreamer: Progressive and Weakness-guided Data Synthesis from Scratch for Table Instruction Tuningcited by 4
  19. 2025Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluationcited by 4
  20. 2026Deep Tabular Research via Continual Experience-Driven Executioncited by 4
  21. 2025ChartLens: Fine-grained Visual Attribution in Chartscited by 3
  22. 2025T2-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 3
  23. 2025TReB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Table Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 3
  24. 2025TabFlash: Efficient Table Understanding with Progressive Question Conditioning and Token Focusingcited by 3
  25. 2026Efficient Table Retrieval and Understanding with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 2
  26. 2025HCT-QA: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Human-Centric Tablescited by 1
  27. 2025What to Keep and What to Drop: Adaptive Table Filtering Frameworkcited by 1
  28. 2026Orthogonal Hierarchical Decomposition for Structure-Aware Table Understanding with Large Language Modelscited by 1
  29. 2025JT-DA: Enhancing Data Analysis with Tool-Integrated Table Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 0
  30. 2026TraceBack: Multi-Agent Decomposition for Fine-Grained Table Attributioncited by 0
  31. 2026SciTaRC: A Plan-Annotated Scientific Tabular QA Benchmark for Language Reasoning and Complex Computationcited by 0
  32. 2026A Closer Look into LLMs for Table Understandingcited by 0