mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Awareness Logic: Kripke Lattices as a Middle Ground between Syntactic and Semantic Models

arXiv 2106.12868 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2021cs.AI cs.LO cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The literature on awareness modeling includes both syntax-free and syntax-based frameworks. Heifetz, Meier & Schipper (HMS) propose a lattice model of awareness that is syntax-free. While their lattice approach is elegant and intuitive, it precludes the simple option of relying on formal language to induce lattices, and does not explicitly distinguish uncertainty from unawareness. Contra this, the most prominent syntax-based solution, the Fagin-Halpern (FH) model, accounts for this distinction and offers a simple representation of awareness, but lacks the intuitiveness of the lattice structure. Here, we combine these two approaches by providing a lattice of Kripke models, induced by atom subset inclusion, in which uncertainty and unawareness are separate. We show our model equivalent to both HMS and FH models by defining transformations between them which preserve satisfaction of formulas of a language for explicit knowledge, and obtain completeness through our and HMS' results. Lastly, we prove that the Kripke lattice model can be shown equivalent to the FH model (when awareness is propositionally determined) also with respect to the language of the Logic of General Awareness, for which the FH model where originally proposed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2021.

Builds on

2 of 23 references.

References · 2

  1. 2013Knowledge, Awareness, and Bisimulationcited by 2
  2. 2020Awareness Logic: A Kripke-based Rendition of the Heifetz-Meier-Schipper Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.