mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Should You Go Deeper? Optimizing Convolutional Neural Network Architectures without Training by Receptive Field Analysis

arXiv 2106.12307 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When optimizing convolutional neural networks (CNN) for a specific image-based task, specialists commonly overshoot the number of convolutional layers in their designs. By implication, these CNNs are unnecessarily resource intensive to train and deploy, with diminishing beneficial effects on the predictive performance. The features a convolutional layer can process are strictly limited by its receptive field. By layer-wise analyzing the size of the receptive fields, we can reliably predict sequences of layers that will not contribute qualitatively to the test accuracy in the given CNN architecture. Based on this analysis, we propose design strategies based on a so-called border layer. This layer allows to identify unproductive convolutional layers and hence to resolve these inefficiencies, optimize the explainability and the computational performance of CNNs. Since neither the strategies nor the analysis requires training of the actual model, these insights allow for a very efficient design process of CNN architectures, which might be automated in the future.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2021.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  8. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  9. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  10. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  11. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  12. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
8 more
  1. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,127
  2. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  3. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  4. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  5. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  6. 2013Network In Networkcited by 600
  7. 2015Highway Networkscited by 257
  8. 2020Feature Space Saturation during Trainingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.