Speed Benchmarking of Genetic Programming Frameworks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Genetic Programming (GP) is known to suffer from the burden of being computationally expensive by design. While, over the years, many techniques have been developed to mitigate this issue, data vectorization, in particular, is arguably still the most attractive strategy due to the parallel nature of GP. In this work, we employ a series of benchmarks meant to compare both the performance and evolution capabilities of different vectorized and iterative implementation approaches across several existing frameworks. Namely, TensorGP, a novel open-source engine written in Python, is shown to greatly benefit from the TensorFlow library to accelerate the domain evaluation phase in GP. The presented performance benchmarks demonstrate that the TensorGP engine manages to pull ahead, with relative speedups above two orders of magnitude for problems with a higher number of fitness cases. Additionally, as a consequence of being able to compute larger domains, we argue that TensorGP performance gains aid the discovery of more accurate candidate solutions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2021.
Builds on
5 of 22 references.
References · 5
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2019TensorFlow.js: Machine Learning for the Web and Beyondcited by 29
- 2019TensorFlow Eager: A Multi-Stage, Python-Embedded DSL for Machine Learningcited by 22
- 2017TensorFlow Enabled Genetic Programmingcited by 5
- 2021TensorGP -- Genetic Programming Engine in TensorFlowcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.