Lifted Model Checking for Relational MDPs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Probabilistic model checking has been developed for verifying systems that have stochastic and nondeterministic behavior. Given a probabilistic system, a probabilistic model checker takes a property and checks whether or not the property holds in that system. For this reason, probabilistic model checking provide rigorous guarantees. So far, however, probabilistic model checking has focused on propositional models where a state is represented by a symbol. On the other hand, it is commonly required to make relational abstractions in planning and reinforcement learning. Various frameworks handle relational domains, for instance, STRIPS planning and relational Markov Decision Processes. Using propositional model checking in relational settings requires one to ground the model, which leads to the well known state explosion problem and intractability. We present pCTL-REBEL, a lifted model checking approach for verifying pCTL properties of relational MDPs. It extends REBEL, a relational model-based reinforcement learning technique, toward relational pCTL model checking. PCTL-REBEL is lifted, which means that rather than grounding, the model exploits symmetries to reason about a group of objects as a whole at the relational level. Theoretically, we show that pCTL model checking is decidable for relational MDPs that have a possibly infinite domain, provided that the states have a bounded size. Practically, we contribute algorithms and an implementation of lifted relational model checking, and we show that the lifted approach improves the scalability of the model checking approach.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2021.
Builds on
7 of 67 references.
References · 7
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2019Reinforcement Learning for Temporal Logic Control Synthesis with Probabilistic Satisfaction Guaranteescited by 77
- 2018Foundations for Restraining Bolts: Reinforcement Learning with LTLf/LDLf restraining specificationscited by 69
- 2017A storm is Coming: A Modern Probabilistic Model Checkercited by 34
- 2015Bounded Situation Calculus Action Theoriescited by 10
- 2013Verification of Agent-Based Artifact Systemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.