mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding top-down attention using task-oriented ablation design

arXiv 2106.11339 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Top-down attention allows neural networks, both artificial and biological, to focus on the information most relevant for a given task. This is known to enhance performance in visual perception. But it remains unclear how attention brings about its perceptual boost, especially when it comes to naturalistic settings like recognising an object in an everyday scene. What aspects of a visual task does attention help to deal with? We aim to answer this with a computational experiment based on a general framework called task-oriented ablation design. First we define a broad range of visual tasks and identify six factors that underlie task variability. Then on each task we compare the performance of two neural networks, one with top-down attention and one without. These comparisons reveal the task-dependence of attention's perceptual boost, giving a clearer idea of the role attention plays. Whereas many existing cognitive accounts link attention to stimulus-level variables, such as visual clutter and object scale, we find greater explanatory power in system-level variables that capture the interaction between the model, the distribution of training data and the task format. This finding suggests a shift in how attention is studied could be fruitful. We make publicly available our code and results, along with statistics relevant to ImageNet-based experiments beyond this one. Our contribution serves to support the development of more human-like vision models and the design of more informative machine-learning experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2021.

Builds on

21 of 81 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  10. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 544
  11. 2014Recurrent Models of Visual Attentioncited by 349
  12. 2016SCA-CNN: Spatial and Channel-wise Attention in Convolutional Networks for Image Captioningcited by 219
9 more
  1. 2017Modulating early visual processing by languagecited by 167
  2. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
  3. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
  4. 2021A Study of Face Obfuscation in ImageNetcited by 83
  5. 2018Hierarchy-based Image Embeddings for Semantic Image Retrievalcited by 41
  6. 2020Enriching ImageNet with Human Similarity Judgments and Psychological Embeddingscited by 23
  7. 2014Deep Networks with Internal Selective Attention through Feedback Connectionscited by 17
  8. 2020The Costs and Benefits of Goal-Directed Attention in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1
  9. 2020The perceptual boost of visual attention is task-dependent in naturalistic settingscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.