Heuristic Stopping Rules For Technology-Assisted Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Technology-assisted review (TAR) refers to human-in-the-loop active learning workflows for finding relevant documents in large collections. These workflows often must meet a target for the proportion of relevant documents found (i.e. recall) while also holding down costs. A variety of heuristic stopping rules have been suggested for striking this tradeoff in particular settings, but none have been tested against a range of recall targets and tasks. We propose two new heuristic stopping rules, Quant and QuantCI based on model-based estimation techniques from survey research. We compare them against a range of proposed heuristics and find they are accurate at hitting a range of recall targets while substantially reducing review costs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2021.
Builds on
3 of 38 references.
References · 3
- 2015Autonomy and Reliability of Continuous Active Learning for Technology-Assisted Reviewcited by 13
- 2017libact: Pool-based Active Learning in Pythoncited by 12
- 2020Providing More Efficient Access To Government Records: A Use Case Involving Application of Machine Learning to Improve FOIA Review for the Deliberative Process Privilegecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.