mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal Bias Quantification for Continuous Treatments

arXiv 2106.09762 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2021stat.ME cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We extend the definition of the marginal causal effect to the continuous treatment setting and develop a novel characterization of causal bias in the framework of structural causal models. We prove that our derived bias expression is zero if, and only if, the causal effect is identifiable via covariate adjustment. We show that under some restrictions on the structural equations, the causal bias can be estimated efficiently and allows for causal regularization of predictive probabilistic models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for causal bias quantification in various settings where (not) controlling for certain covariates would introduce causal bias.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2021.

Builds on

8 of 48 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  5. 2015Nonparametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effectscited by 64
  6. 2020Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimatorscited by 11
  7. 2016Observational-Interventional Priors for Dose-Response Learningcited by 10
  8. 2016Model Criticism for Bayesian Causal Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.