The Parity Ray Regularizer for Pacing in Auction Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Budget-management systems are one of the key components of modern auction markets. Internet advertising platforms typically offer advertisers the possibility to pace the rate at which their budget is depleted, through budget-pacing mechanisms. We focus on multiplicative pacing mechanisms in an online setting in which a bidder is repeatedly confronted with a series of advertising opportunities. After collecting bids, each item is then allocated through a single-item, second-price auction. If there were no budgetary constraints, bidding truthfully would be an optimal choice for the advertiser. However, since their budget is limited, the advertiser may want to shade their bid downwards in order to preserve their budget for future opportunities, and to spread expenditures evenly over time. The literature on online pacing problems mostly focuses on the setting in which the bidder optimizes an additive separable objective, such as the total click-through rate or the revenue of the allocation. In many settings, however, bidders may also care about other objectives which oftentimes are non-separable, and therefore not amenable to traditional online learning techniques. Building on recent work, we study the frequent case in which advertisers seek to reach a certain distribution of impressions over a target population of users. We introduce a novel regularizer to achieve this desideratum, and show how to integrate it into an online mirror descent scheme attaining the optimal order of sub-linear regret compared to the optimal allocation in hindsight when inputs are drawn independently, from an unknown distribution. Moreover, we show that our approach can easily be incorporated in standard existing pacing systems that are not usually built for this objective. The effectiveness of our algorithm in internet advertising applications is confirmed by numerical experiments on real-world data.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022A Unifying Framework for Online Optimization with Long-Term Constraintscited by 41
- 2022Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertiserscited by 17
- 2022Optimal Regularized Online Allocation by Adaptive Re-Solvingcited by 8
- 2023Coordinated Dynamic Bidding in Repeated Second-Price Auctions with Budgetscited by 4
- 2022Dynamic Budget Throttling in Repeated Second-Price Auctionscited by 2
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocationcited by 2
- 2025Online Bidding under RoS Constraints without Knowing the Valuecited by 2
- 2025Online Bidding under RoS Constraints without Knowing the Value5 Mar 2025
- 2023Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocation23 Jun 2023
- 2023Coordinated Dynamic Bidding in Repeated Second-Price Auctions with Budgets13 Jun 2023
- 2022A Unifying Framework for Online Optimization with Long-Term Constraints15 Sep 2022
- 2022Optimal Regularized Online Allocation by Adaptive Re-Solving1 Sep 2022
- 2022Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers29 Aug 2022
- 2022Dynamic Budget Throttling in Repeated Second-Price Auctions11 Jul 2022