mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Now You See It, Now You Dont: Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Computational Pathology

arXiv 2106.08153 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2021eess.IV cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are routinely employed in computational pathology (CPath) for solving problems of diagnostic and prognostic significance. Typically, the generalization performance of CPath models is analyzed using evaluation protocols such as cross-validation and testing on multi-centric cohorts. However, to ensure that such CPath solutions are robust and safe for use in a clinical setting, a critical analysis of their predictive performance and vulnerability to adversarial attacks is required, which is the focus of this paper. Specifically, we show that a highly accurate model for classification of tumour patches in pathology images (AUC > 0.95) can easily be attacked with minimal perturbations which are imperceptible to lay humans and trained pathologists alike. Our analytical results show that it is possible to generate single-instance white-box attacks on specific input images with high success rate and low perturbation energy. Furthermore, we have also generated a single universal perturbation matrix using the training dataset only which, when added to unseen test images, results in forcing the trained neural network to flip its prediction labels with high confidence at a success rate of > 84%. We systematically analyze the relationship between perturbation energy of an adversarial attack, its impact on morphological constructs of clinical significance, their perceptibility by a trained pathologist and saliency maps obtained using deep learning models. Based on our analysis, we strongly recommend that computational pathology models be critically analyzed using the proposed adversarial validation strategy prior to clinical adoption.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  8. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  9. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  10. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  11. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  12. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
10 more
  1. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 387
  2. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  3. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  4. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  5. 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
  6. 2019Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systemscited by 151
  7. 2020PanNuke Dataset Extension, Insights and Baselinescited by 113
  8. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  9. 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Medical Deep Learning Systemscited by 61
  10. 2019Detecting Overfitting via Adversarial Examplescited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.