Assessing the Use of Prosody in Constituency Parsing of Imperfect Transcripts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work explores constituency parsing on automatically recognized transcripts of conversational speech. The neural parser is based on a sentence encoder that leverages word vectors contextualized with prosodic features, jointly learning prosodic feature extraction with parsing. We assess the utility of the prosody in parsing on imperfect transcripts, i.e. transcripts with automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors, by applying the parser in an N-best reranking framework. In experiments on Switchboard, we obtain 13-15% of the oracle N-best gain relative to parsing the 1-best ASR output, with insignificant impact on word recognition error rate. Prosody provides a significant part of the gain, and analyses suggest that it leads to more grammatical utterances via recovering function words.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.
Builds on
10 of 30 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 196
- 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
- 2018Deep RNNs Encode Soft Hierarchical Syntaxcited by 34
- 2020Linguistic Profiling of a Neural Language Modelcited by 23
- 2019Disfluencies and Human Speech Transcription Errorscited by 21
- 2019Neural Constituency Parsing of Speech Transcriptscited by 10
- 2020On the Role of Style in Parsing Speech with Neural Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.