mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discerning the painter's hand: machine learning on surface topography

arXiv 2106.07134 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution of paintings is a critical problem in art history. This study extends machine learning analysis to surface topography of painted works. A controlled study of positive attribution was designed with paintings produced by a class of art students. The paintings were scanned using a confocal optical profilometer to produce surface data. The surface data were divided into virtual patches and used to train an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for attribution. Over a range of patch sizes from 0.5 to 60 mm, the resulting attribution was found to be 60 to 96% accurate, and, when comparing regions of different color, was nearly twice as accurate as CNNs using color images of the paintings. Remarkably, short length scales, as small as twice a bristle diameter, were the key to reliably distinguishing among artists. These results show promise for real-world attribution, particularly in the case of workshop practice.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.

Builds on

1 of 35 references.

References · 1

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.