Is Perfect Filtering Enough Leading to Perfect Phase Correction for dMRI data?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Being complex-valued and low in signal-to-noise ratios, magnitude-based diffusion MRI is confounded by the noise-floor that falsely elevates signal magnitude and incurs bias to the commonly used diffusion indices, such as fractional anisotropy (FA). To avoid noise-floor, most existing phase correction methods explore improving filters to estimate the noise-free background phase. In this work, after diving into the phase correction procedures, we argue that even a perfect filter is insufficient for phase correction because the correction procedures are incapable of distinguishing sign-symbols of noise, resulting in artifacts (textiti.e., arbitrary signal loss). With this insight, we generalize the definition of noise-floor to a complex polar coordinate system and propose a calibration procedure that could conveniently distinguish noise sign symbols. The calibration procedure is conceptually simple and easy to implement without relying on any external technique while keeping distinctly effective.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2021.
Builds on
0 of 12 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.