Quantifying the Conceptual Error in Dimensionality Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dimension reduction of data sets is a standard problem in the realm of machine learning and knowledge reasoning. They affect patterns in and dependencies on data dimensions and ultimately influence any decision-making processes. Therefore, a wide variety of reduction procedures are in use, each pursuing different objectives. A so far not considered criterion is the conceptual continuity of the reduction mapping, i.e., the preservation of the conceptual structure with respect to the original data set. Based on the notion scale-measure from formal concept analysis we present in this work a) the theoretical foundations to detect and quantify conceptual errors in data scalings; b) an experimental investigation of our approach on eleven data sets that were respectively treated with a variant of non-negative matrix factorization.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2021.
Builds on
2 of 19 references.
References · 2
- 2018NIMFA: A Python Library for Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 10
- 2020On the Lattice of Conceptual Measurementscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Scaling Dimensioncited by 2
- 2023Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Latticescited by 2
- 2022Conceptual Views of Neural Networks: A Framework for Neuro-Symbolic Analysiscited by 1
- 2023Towards Ordinal Data Sciencecited by 1
- 2024The Geometric Structure of Topic Modelscited by 1
- 2024Conceptual Mapping of Controversiescited by 0
- 2024Conceptual Mapping of Controversies25 Apr 2024
- 2024The Geometric Structure of Topic Models6 Mar 2024
- 2023Towards Ordinal Data Science13 Jul 2023
- 2023Automatic Textual Explanations of Concept Lattices17 Apr 2023
- 2023Scaling Dimension17 Feb 2023
- 2022Conceptual Views of Neural Networks: A Framework for Neuro-Symbolic Analysis27 Sep 2022