mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Quantifying the Conceptual Error in Dimensionality Reduction

arXiv 2106.06815 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dimension reduction of data sets is a standard problem in the realm of machine learning and knowledge reasoning. They affect patterns in and dependencies on data dimensions and ultimately influence any decision-making processes. Therefore, a wide variety of reduction procedures are in use, each pursuing different objectives. A so far not considered criterion is the conceptual continuity of the reduction mapping, i.e., the preservation of the conceptual structure with respect to the original data set. Based on the notion scale-measure from formal concept analysis we present in this work a) the theoretical foundations to detect and quantify conceptual errors in data scalings; b) an experimental investigation of our approach on eleven data sets that were respectively treated with a variant of non-negative matrix factorization.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2021.

Builds on

2 of 19 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018NIMFA: A Python Library for Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 10
  2. 2020On the Lattice of Conceptual Measurementscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2.

6 papers.