Explaining the Deep Natural Language Processing by Mining Textual Interpretable Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the high accuracy offered by state-of-the-art deep natural-language models (e.g. LSTM, BERT), their application in real-life settings is still widely limited, as they behave like a black-box to the end-user. Hence, explainability is rapidly becoming a fundamental requirement of future-generation data-driven systems based on deep-learning approaches. Several attempts to fulfill the existing gap between accuracy and interpretability have been done. However, robust and specialized xAI (Explainable Artificial Intelligence) solutions tailored to deep natural-language models are still missing. We propose a new framework, named T-EBAnO, which provides innovative prediction-local and class-based model-global explanation strategies tailored to black-box deep natural-language models. Given a deep NLP model and the textual input data, T-EBAnO provides an objective, human-readable, domain-specific assessment of the reasons behind the automatic decision-making process. Specifically, the framework extracts sets of interpretable features mining the inner knowledge of the model. Then, it quantifies the influence of each feature during the prediction process by exploiting the novel normalized Perturbation Influence Relation index at the local level and the novel Global Absolute Influence and Global Relative Influence indexes at the global level. The effectiveness and the quality of the local and global explanations obtained with T-EBAnO are proved on (i) a sentiment analysis task performed by a fine-tuned BERT model, and (ii) a toxic comment classification task performed by an LSTM model.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2021.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
6 more
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 224
- 2017A causal framework for explaining the predictions of black-box sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 58
- 2017Automatic Rule Extraction from Long Short Term Memory Networkscited by 10
- 2018Learning and Evaluating Sparse Interpretable Sentence Embeddingscited by 6
- 2016The Tyranny of Data? The Bright and Dark Sides of Data-Driven Decision-Making for Social Goodcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.