mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visualizing Classifier Adjacency Relations: A Case Study in Speaker Verification and Voice Anti-Spoofing

arXiv 2106.06362 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2021cs.SD cs.LG eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Whether it be for results summarization, or the analysis of classifier fusion, some means to compare different classifiers can often provide illuminating insight into their behaviour, (dis)similarity or complementarity. We propose a simple method to derive 2D representation from detection scores produced by an arbitrary set of binary classifiers in response to a common dataset. Based upon rank correlations, our method facilitates a visual comparison of classifiers with arbitrary scores and with close relation to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and detection error trade-off (DET) analyses. While the approach is fully versatile and can be applied to any detection task, we demonstrate the method using scores produced by automatic speaker verification and voice anti-spoofing systems. The former are produced by a Gaussian mixture model system trained with VoxCeleb data whereas the latter stem from submissions to the ASVspoof 2019 challenge.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2021.

Builds on

4 of 17 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 714
  2. 2021ASVspoof 2019: spoofing countermeasures for the detection of synthesized, converted and replayed speechcited by 56
  3. 2020Tandem Assessment of Spoofing Countermeasures and Automatic Speaker Verification: Fundamentalscited by 22
  4. 2013The PAV algorithm optimizes binary proper scoring rulescited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.