mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FiSH: Fair Spatial Hotspots

arXiv 2106.06049 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pervasiveness of tracking devices and enhanced availability of spatially located data has deepened interest in using them for various policy interventions, through computational data analysis tasks such as spatial hot spot detection. In this paper, we consider, for the first time to our best knowledge, fairness in detecting spatial hot spots. We motivate the need for ensuring fairness through statistical parity over the collective population covered across chosen hot spots. We then characterize the task of identifying a diverse set of solutions in the noteworthiness-fairness trade-off spectrum, to empower the user to choose a trade-off justified by the policy domain. Being a novel task formulation, we also develop a suite of evaluation metrics for fair hot spots, motivated by the need to evaluate pertinent aspects of the task. We illustrate the computational infeasibility of identifying fair hot spots using naive and/or direct approaches and devise a method, codenamed it FiSH, for efficiently identifying high-quality, fair and diverse sets of spatial hot spots. FiSH traverses the tree-structured search space using heuristics that guide it towards identifying effective and fair sets of spatial hot spots. Through an extensive empirical analysis over a real-world dataset from the domain of human development, we illustrate that FiSH generates high-quality solutions at fast response times.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

14 of 63 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  2. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
  3. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  4. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  5. 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
  6. 2019Robust Subspace Recovery Layer for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 31
  7. 2020FairOD: Fairness-aware Outlier Detectioncited by 24
  8. 2020Towards Fair Deep Anomaly Detectioncited by 24
  9. 2018Convex Formulations for Fair Principal Component Analysiscited by 20
  10. 2019Fairness in Clustering with Multiple Sensitive Attributescited by 20
  11. 2020Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning modelscited by 13
  12. 2020Fair Outlier Detectioncited by 10
2 more
  1. 2019Towards Fair Deep Clustering With Multi-State Protected Variablescited by 9
  2. 2020FROCC: Fast Random projection-based One-Class Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.