mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Machine Learning under Limited Demographically Labeled Data

arXiv 2106.04757 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research has shown that, machine learning models might inherit and propagate undesired social biases encoded in the data. To address this problem, fair training algorithms are developed. However, most algorithms assume we know demographic/sensitive data features such as gender and race. This assumption falls short in scenarios where collecting demographic information is not feasible due to privacy concerns, and data protection policies. A recent line of work develops fair training methods that can function without any demographic feature on the data, that are collectively referred as Rawlsian methods. Yet, we show in experiments that, Rawlsian methods tend to exhibit relatively high bias. Given this, we look at the middle ground between the previous approaches, and consider a setting where we know the demographic attributes for only a small subset of our data. In such a setting, we design fair training algorithms which exhibit both good utility, and low bias. In particular, we show that our techniques can train models to significantly outperform Rawlsian approaches even when 0.1% of demographic attributes are available in the training data. Furthermore, our main algorithm can accommodate multiple training objectives easily. We expand our main algorithm to achieve robustness to label noise in addition to fairness in the limited demographics setting to highlight that property as well.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2021.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  9. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  10. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  11. 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
  12. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
15 more
  1. 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 403
  2. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  3. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2019Optimizing Millions of Hyperparameters by Implicit Differentiationcited by 303
  6. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  7. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  8. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  9. 2018Truncated Back-propagation for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 187
  10. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  11. 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
  12. 2019Generalized Inner Loop Meta-Learningcited by 92
  13. 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
  14. 2018Deep Bilevel Learningcited by 48
  15. 2017Penalizing Unfairness in Binary Classificationcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.