The effect of phased recurrent units in the classification of multiple catalogs of astronomical lightcurves
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the new era of very large telescopes, where data is crucial to expand scientific knowledge, we have witnessed many deep learning applications for the automatic classification of lightcurves. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are one of the models used for these applications, and the LSTM unit stands out for being an excellent choice for the representation of long time series. In general, RNNs assume observations at discrete times, which may not suit the irregular sampling of lightcurves. A traditional technique to address irregular sequences consists of adding the sampling time to the network's input, but this is not guaranteed to capture sampling irregularities during training. Alternatively, the Phased LSTM unit has been created to address this problem by updating its state using the sampling times explicitly. In this work, we study the effectiveness of the LSTM and Phased LSTM based architectures for the classification of astronomical lightcurves. We use seven catalogs containing periodic and nonperiodic astronomical objects. Our findings show that LSTM outperformed PLSTM on 6/7 datasets. However, the combination of both units enhances the results in all datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.
Builds on
13 of 71 references.
References · 13
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2015LSTM: A Search Space Odysseycited by 316
- 2015Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology predictioncited by 83
- 2016Deep Neural Networks to Enable Real-time Multimessenger Astrophysicscited by 24
- 2017Deep-HiTS: Rotation Invariant Convolutional Neural Network for Transient Detectioncited by 12
- 2020Scalable End-to-end Recurrent Neural Network for Variable star classificationcited by 9
- 2016Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Supernovae Classificationcited by 8
- 2014Supervised detection of anomalous light-curves in massive astronomical catalogscited by 4
- 2016Clustering Based Feature Learning on Variable Starscited by 4
- 2017Deep-Learnt Classification of Light Curvescited by 4
- 2013An improved quasar detection method in EROS-2 and MACHO LMC datasetscited by 3
- 2019Streaming Classification of Variable Starscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.