Proximal nested sampling for high-dimensional Bayesian model selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian model selection provides a powerful framework for objectively comparing models directly from observed data, without reference to ground truth data. However, Bayesian model selection requires the computation of the marginal likelihood (model evidence), which is computationally challenging, prohibiting its use in many high-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems. With Bayesian imaging applications in mind, in this work we present the proximal nested sampling methodology to objectively compare alternative Bayesian imaging models for applications that use images to inform decisions under uncertainty. The methodology is based on nested sampling, a Monte Carlo approach specialised for model comparison, and exploits proximal Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques to scale efficiently to large problems and to tackle models that are log-concave and not necessarily smooth (e.g., involving l_1 or total-variation priors). The proposed approach can be applied computationally to problems of dimension O(10^6) and beyond, making it suitable for high-dimensional inverse imaging problems. It is validated on large Gaussian models, for which the likelihood is available analytically, and subsequently illustrated on a range of imaging problems where it is used to analyse different choices of dictionary and measurement model.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023Improving Gradient-guided Nested Sampling for Posterior Inferencecited by 14
- 2022The split Gibbs sampler revisited: improvements to its algorithmic structure and augmented target distributioncited by 11
- 2023Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithmscited by 4
- 2023Proximal nested sampling with data-driven priors for physical scientistscited by 4
- 2023Accelerated Bayesian imaging by relaxed proximal-point Langevin samplingcited by 4
- 2024Bayesian evidence estimation from posterior samples with normalizing flowscited by 4
- 2025The Performance Of The Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm Without Smoothness Assumptionscited by 4
- 2026Sample-efficient evidence estimation of score based priors for model selectioncited by 3
- 2023Learned Interferometric Imaging for the SPIDER Instrumentcited by 1
- 2025Bayesian model selection and misspecification testing in imaging inverse problems only from noisy and partial measurementscited by 0
- 2026Automatic Laplace Collapsed Sampling: Scalable Marginalisation of Latent Parameters via Automatic Differentiationcited by 0
- 2026Automatic Laplace Collapsed Sampling: Scalable Marginalisation of Latent Parameters via Automatic Differentiation27 Mar 2026
- 2026Sample-efficient evidence estimation of score based priors for model selection24 Feb 2026
- 2025Bayesian model selection and misspecification testing in imaging inverse problems only from noisy and partial measurements31 Oct 2025
- 2025The Performance Of The Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm Without Smoothness Assumptions5 Feb 2025
- 2024Bayesian evidence estimation from posterior samples with normalizing flows18 Apr 2024
- 2023Improving Gradient-guided Nested Sampling for Posterior Inference6 Dec 2023
- 2023Accelerated Bayesian imaging by relaxed proximal-point Langevin sampling18 Aug 2023
- 2023Proximal nested sampling with data-driven priors for physical scientists30 Jun 2023
- 2023Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms25 May 2023
- 2023Learned Interferometric Imaging for the SPIDER Instrument24 Jan 2023
- 2022The split Gibbs sampler revisited: improvements to its algorithmic structure and augmented target distribution28 Jun 2022