mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

What if we Increase the Number of Objectives? Theoretical and Empirical Implications for Many-objective Optimization

arXiv 2106.03275 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2021cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The difficulty of solving a multi-objective optimization problem is impacted by the number of objectives to be optimized. The presence of many objectives typically introduces a number of challenges that affect the choice/design of optimization algorithms. This paper investigates the drivers of these challenges from two angles: (i) the influence of the number of objectives on problem characteristics and (ii) the practical behavior of commonly used procedures and algorithms for coping with many objectives. In addition to reviewing various drivers, the paper makes theoretical contributions by quantifying some drivers and/or verifying these drivers empirically by carrying out experiments on multi-objective NK landscapes and other typical benchmarks. We then make use of our theoretical and empirical findings to derive practical recommendations to support algorithm design. Finally, we discuss remaining theoretical gaps and opportunities for future research in the area of multi- and many-objective optimization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2021.

Builds on

2 of 76 references.

References · 2

  1. 2015A Box Decomposition Algorithm to Compute the Hypervolume Indicatorcited by 9
  2. 2016Improved Quick Hypervolume Algorithmcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.