Great Service! Fine-grained Parsing of Implicit Arguments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Broad-coverage meaning representations in NLP mostly focus on explicitly expressed content. More importantly, the scarcity of datasets annotating diverse implicit roles limits empirical studies into their linguistic nuances. For example, in the web review "Great service!", the provider and consumer are implicit arguments of different types. We examine an annotated corpus of fine-grained implicit arguments (Cui and Hershcovich, 2020) by carefully re-annotating it, resolving several inconsistencies. Subsequently, we present the first transition-based neural parser that can handle implicit arguments dynamically, and experiment with two different transition systems on the improved dataset. We find that certain types of implicit arguments are more difficult to parse than others and that the simpler system is more accurate in recovering implicit arguments, despite having a lower overall parsing score, attesting current reasoning limitations of NLP models. This work will facilitate a better understanding of implicit and underspecified language, by incorporating it holistically into meaning representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2021.
Builds on
11 of 55 references.
References · 11
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
- 2018Comprehensive Supersense Disambiguation of English Prepositions and Possessivescited by 20
- 2017A Transition-Based Directed Acyclic Graph Parser for UCCAcited by 13
- 2019Where's My Head? Definition, Dataset and Models for Numeric Fused-Heads Identification and Resolutioncited by 11
- 2018Implicit Argument Prediction with Event Knowledgecited by 9
- 2019SemEval-2019 Task 1: Cross-lingual Semantic Parsing with UCCAcited by 5
- 2019Content Differences in Syntactic and Semantic Representationscited by 4
- 2019Semantically Constrained Multilayer Annotation: The Case of Coreferencecited by 3
- 2020Refining Implicit Argument Annotation for UCCAcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.