Detecting Bot-Generated Text by Characterizing Linguistic Accommodation in Human-Bot Interactions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language generation models' democratization benefits many domains, from answering health-related questions to enhancing education by providing AI-driven tutoring services. However, language generation models' democratization also makes it easier to generate human-like text at-scale for nefarious activities, from spreading misinformation to targeting specific groups with hate speech. Thus, it is essential to understand how people interact with bots and develop methods to detect bot-generated text. This paper shows that bot-generated text detection methods are more robust across datasets and models if we use information about how people respond to it rather than using the bot's text directly. We also analyze linguistic alignment, providing insight into differences between human-human and human-bot conversations.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
8 of 54 references.
References · 8
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
- 2019The Second Conversational Intelligence Challenge (ConvAI2)cited by 178
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
- 2020A Qualitative Evaluation of Language Models on Automatic Question-Answering for COVID-19cited by 7
- 2021Chatbots language design: the influence of language variation on user experiencecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
- 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 75
- 2023Mutation-Based Adversarial Attacks on Neural Text Detectorscited by 9
- 2025Do language models accommodate their users? A study of linguistic convergencecited by 7
- 2024MUGC: Machine Generated versus User Generated Content Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Short-PHD: Detecting Short LLM-generated Text with Topological Data Analysis After Off-topic Content Insertioncited by 2
- 2026Accommodation Goes Both Ways: Studying Linguistic Convergence Between Humans and Language Modelscited by 2
- 2024Spot the bot: Coarse-Grained Partition of Semantic Paths for Bots and Humanscited by 0
- 2026Accommodation Goes Both Ways: Studying Linguistic Convergence Between Humans and Language Models28 May 2026
- 2025Do language models accommodate their users? A study of linguistic convergence5 Aug 2025
- 2025Short-PHD: Detecting Short LLM-generated Text with Topological Data Analysis After Off-topic Content Insertion1 Apr 2025
- 2024MUGC: Machine Generated versus User Generated Content Detection28 Mar 2024
- 2024Spot the bot: Coarse-Grained Partition of Semantic Paths for Bots and Humans27 Feb 2024
- 2023Mutation-Based Adversarial Attacks on Neural Text Detectors11 Feb 2023
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts4 Feb 2023
- 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methods13 Oct 2022