SyGNS: A Systematic Generalization Testbed Based on Natural Language Semantics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved great success in semantically challenging NLP tasks, yet it remains unclear whether DNN models can capture compositional meanings, those aspects of meaning that have been long studied in formal semantics. To investigate this issue, we propose a Systematic Generalization testbed based on Natural language Semantics (SyGNS), whose challenge is to map natural language sentences to multiple forms of scoped meaning representations, designed to account for various semantic phenomena. Using SyGNS, we test whether neural networks can systematically parse sentences involving novel combinations of logical expressions such as quantifiers and negation. Experiments show that Transformer and GRU models can generalize to unseen combinations of quantifiers, negations, and modifiers that are similar to given training instances in form, but not to the others. We also find that the generalization performance to unseen combinations is better when the form of meaning representations is simpler. The data and code for SyGNS are publicly available at https://github.com/verypluming/SyGNS.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
35 of 64 references.
References · 35
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 211
23 more
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
- 2019CLUTRR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Inductive Reasoning from Textcited by 155
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2019Probing Natural Language Inference Models through Semantic Fragmentscited by 64
- 2019MultiQA: An Empirical Investigation of Generalization and Transfer in Reading Comprehensioncited by 60
- 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 58
- 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
- 2019Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning?cited by 45
- 2017Premise Selection for Theorem Proving by Deep Graph Embeddingcited by 44
- 2019Probing What Different NLP Tasks Teach Machines about Function Word Comprehensioncited by 44
- 2019Inoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasetscited by 41
- 2020Probing Linguistic Systematicitycited by 37
- 2018Evaluating Compositionality in Sentence Embeddingscited by 35
- 2018Revisiting the poverty of the stimulus: hierarchical generalization without a hierarchical bias in recurrent neural networkscited by 33
- 2020Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language?cited by 29
- 2020TaxiNLI: Taking a Ride up the NLU Hillcited by 27
- 2020ConjNLI: Natural Language Inference Over Conjunctive Sentencescited by 27
- 2018Analyzing Compositionality-Sensitivity of NLI Modelscited by 26
- 2019Diversify Your Datasets: Analyzing Generalization via Controlled Variance in Adversarial Datasetscited by 21
- 2021Exploring Transitivity in Neural NLI Models through Veridicalitycited by 15
- 2018Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structurescited by 14
- 2018Evaluating Scoped Meaning Representationscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3.
7 papers.
- 2022Uncontrolled Lexical Exposure Leads to Overestimation of Compositional Generalization in Pretrained Modelscited by 26
- 2021Dyna-bAbI: unlocking bAbI's potential with dynamic synthetic benchmarkingcited by 7
- 2023Representation biases in sentence transformerscited by 7
- 2023MAGNIFICo: Evaluating the In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models to Generalize to Novel Interpretationscited by 7
- 2023Learning Disentangled Semantic Spaces of Explanations via Invertible Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2022Quasi-symbolic Semantic Geometry over Transformer-based Variational AutoEncodercited by 5
- 2021Abstraction, Reasoning and Deep Learning: A Study of the "Look and Say" Sequencecited by 2
- 2023MAGNIFICo: Evaluating the In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models to Generalize to Novel Interpretations18 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning Disentangled Semantic Spaces of Explanations via Invertible Neural Networks2 May 2023
- 2023Representation biases in sentence transformers30 Jan 2023
- 2022Uncontrolled Lexical Exposure Leads to Overestimation of Compositional Generalization in Pretrained Models21 Dec 2022
- 2022Quasi-symbolic Semantic Geometry over Transformer-based Variational AutoEncoder12 Oct 2022
- 2021Dyna-bAbI: unlocking bAbI's potential with dynamic synthetic benchmarking30 Nov 2021
- 2021Abstraction, Reasoning and Deep Learning: A Study of the "Look and Say" Sequence27 Sep 2021