Combining case-control studies for identifiability and efficiency improvement in logistic regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can two separate case-control studies, one about Hepatitis disease and the other about Fibrosis, for example, be combined together? It would be hugely beneficial if two or more separately conducted case-control studies, even for entirely irrelevant purposes, can be merged together with a unified analysis that produces better statistical properties, e.g., more accurate estimation of parameters. In this paper, we show that, when using the popular logistic regression model, the combined/integrative analysis produces a more accurate estimation of the slope parameters than the single case-control study. It is known that, in a single logistic case-control study, the intercept is not identifiable, contrary to prospective studies. In combined case-control studies, however, the intercepts are proved to be identifiable under mild conditions. The resulting maximum likelihood estimates of the intercepts and slopes are proved to be consistent and asymptotically normal, with asymptotic variances achieving the semiparametric efficiency lower bound.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Efficient semi-supervised inference for logistic regression under case-control studiescited by 1
- 2024Statistical inference for case-control logistic regression via integrating external summary datacited by 1
- 2024Deep non-parametric logistic model with case-control data and external summary informationcited by 0
- 2024Deep non-parametric logistic model with case-control data and external summary information3 Sep 2024
- 2024Statistical inference for case-control logistic regression via integrating external summary data31 May 2024
- 2024Efficient semi-supervised inference for logistic regression under case-control studies23 Feb 2024