A Study On the Effects of Pre-processing On Spatio-temporal Action Recognition Using Spiking Neural Networks Trained with STDP
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There has been an increasing interest in spiking neural networks in recent years. SNNs are seen as hypothetical solutions for the bottlenecks of ANNs in pattern recognition, such as energy efficiency. But current methods such as ANN-to-SNN conversion and back-propagation do not take full advantage of these networks, and unsupervised methods have not yet reached a success comparable to advanced artificial neural networks. It is important to study the behavior of SNNs trained with unsupervised learning methods such as spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) on video classification tasks, including mechanisms to model motion information using spikes, as this information is critical for video understanding. This paper presents multiple methods of transposing temporal information into a static format, and then transforming the visual information into spikes using latency coding. These methods are paired with two types of temporal fusion known as early and late fusion, and are used to help the spiking neural network in capturing the spatio-temporal features from videos. In this paper, we rely on the network architecture of a convolutional spiking neural network trained with STDP, and we test the performance of this network when challenged with action recognition tasks. Understanding how a spiking neural network responds to different methods of movement extraction and representation can help reduce the performance gap between SNNs and ANNs. In this paper we show the effect of the similarity in the shape and speed of certain actions on action recognition with spiking neural networks, we also highlight the effectiveness of some methods compared to others.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2021.
Builds on
7 of 28 references.
References · 7
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
- 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 399
- 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 258
- 2019Enabling Spike-based Backpropagation for Training Deep Neural Network Architecturescited by 119
- 2019Spatiotemporal Pyramid Network for Video Action Recognitioncited by 37
- 2019Multi-layered Spiking Neural Network with Target Timestamp Threshold Adaptation and STDPcited by 14
- 2019Unsupervised Visual Feature Learning with Spike-timing-dependent Plasticity: How Far are we from Traditional Feature Learning Approaches?cited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Spiking Neural Networks for Frame-based and Event-based Single Object Localizationcited by 18
- 20222D versus 3D Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks Trained with Unsupervised STDP for Human Action Recognitioncited by 5
- 2023Spiking Two-Stream Methods with Unsupervised STDP-based Learning for Action Recognitioncited by 1
- 2023S3TC: Spiking Separated Spatial and Temporal Convolutions with Unsupervised STDP-based Learning for Action Recognitioncited by 1
- 2023S3TC: Spiking Separated Spatial and Temporal Convolutions with Unsupervised STDP-based Learning for Action Recognition22 Sep 2023
- 2023Spiking Two-Stream Methods with Unsupervised STDP-based Learning for Action Recognition23 Jun 2023
- 2022Spiking Neural Networks for Frame-based and Event-based Single Object Localization13 Jun 2022
- 20222D versus 3D Convolutional Spiking Neural Networks Trained with Unsupervised STDP for Human Action Recognition26 May 2022