mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

REAMsharp: An Enhancement Approach to Reference-based Evaluation Metrics for Open-domain Dialog Generation

arXiv 2105.14488 ↗First posted 30 May 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The lack of reliable automatic evaluation metrics is a major impediment to the development of open-domain dialogue systems. Various reference-based metrics have been proposed to calculate a score between a predicted response and a small set of references. However, these metrics show unsatisfactory correlations with human judgments. For a reference-based metric, its reliability mainly depends on two factors: its ability to measure the similarity between the predicted response and the reference response, as well as the reliability of the given reference set. Yet, there are few discussions on the latter. Our work attempts to fill this vacancy. We first clarify an assumption on reference-based metrics that, if more high-quality references are added into the reference set, the reliability of the metric will increase. Next, we present REAMsharp: an enhancement approach to Reference-based EvAluation Metrics for open-domain dialogue systems. A prediction model is designed to estimate the reliability of the given reference set. We show how its predicted results can be helpful to augment the reference set, and thus improve the reliability of the metric. Experiments validate both the effectiveness of our prediction model and that the reliability of reference-based metrics improves with the augmented reference sets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2021.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
  6. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  7. 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
  8. 2020USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generationcited by 186
  9. 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
  10. 2017Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 103
  11. 2017Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responsescited by 98
  12. 2017RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 88
9 more
  1. 2020GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Systemscited by 76
  2. 2016A Simple, Fast Diverse Decoding Algorithm for Neural Generationcited by 58
  3. 2019Better Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 52
  4. 2016Mutual Information and Diverse Decoding Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  5. 2019A Discrete CVAE for Response Generation on Short-Text Conversationcited by 17
  6. 2021Assessing Dialogue Systems with Distribution Distancescited by 16
  7. 2018Generating Multiple Diverse Responses for Short-Text Conversationcited by 13
  8. 2019Fine-Grained Sentence Functions for Short-Text Conversationcited by 5
  9. 2019Relevance-Promoting Language Model for Short-Text Conversationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1.

4 papers.