Approximate Implication with d-Separation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The graphical structure of Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs) encodes the conditional independence (CI) relations that hold in the modeled distribution. Graph algorithms, such as d-separation, use this structure to infer additional conditional independencies, and to query whether a specific CI holds in the distribution. The premise of all current systems-of-inference for deriving CIs in PGMs, is that the set of CIs used for the construction of the PGM hold exactly. In practice, algorithms for extracting the structure of PGMs from data, discover approximate CIs that do not hold exactly in the distribution. In this paper, we ask how the error in this set propagates to the inferred CIs read off the graphical structure. More precisely, what guarantee can we provide on the inferred CI when the set of CIs that entailed it hold only approximately? It has recently been shown that in the general case, no such guarantee can be provided. We prove that such a guarantee exists for the set of CIs inferred in directed graphical models, making the d-separation algorithm a sound and complete system for inferring approximate CIs. We also prove an approximation guarantee for independence relations derived from marginal CIs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2021.
Builds on
5 of 31 references.
References · 5
- 2013Causal Networks: Semantics and Expressivenesscited by 67
- 2013On the Logic of Causal Modelscited by 19
- 2018Who Learns Better Bayesian Network Structures: Accuracy and Speed of Structure Learning Algorithmscited by 4
- 2018Integrity Constraints Revisited: From Exact to Approximate Implicationcited by 2
- 2019Mining Approximate Acyclic Schemes from Relationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Approximate Implication for Probabilistic Graphical Models21 Oct 2023