Graph Similarity Description: How Are These Graphs Similar?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How do social networks differ across platforms? How do information networks change over time? Answering questions like these requires us to compare two or more graphs. This task is commonly treated as a measurement problem, but numerical answers give limited insight. Here, we argue that if the goal is to gain understanding, we should treat graph similarity assessment as a description problem instead. We formalize this problem as a model selection task using the Minimum Description Length principle, capturing the similarity of the input graphs in a common model and the differences between them in transformations to individual models. To discover good models, we propose Momo, which breaks the problem into two parts and introduces efficient algorithms for each. Through an extensive set of experiments on a wide range of synthetic and real-world graphs, we confirm that Momo works well in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2021.
Builds on
6 of 31 references.
References · 6
- 2017Predicting multicellular function through multi-layer tissue networkscited by 138
- 2019Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelscited by 104
- 2019Deep Graph Similarity Learning: A Surveycited by 19
- 2021Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germanycited by 17
- 2018An information-theoretic, all-scales approach to comparing networkscited by 7
- 2014VoG: Summarizing and Understanding Large Graphscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.