mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Scientific Image Forgery Detectors

arXiv 2105.12872 ↗First posted 26 May 2021cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The scientific image integrity area presents a challenging research bottleneck, the lack of available datasets to design and evaluate forensic techniques. Its data sensitivity creates a legal hurdle that prevents one to rely on real tampered cases to build any sort of accessible forensic benchmark. To mitigate this bottleneck, we present an extendable open-source library that reproduces the most common image forgery operations reported by the research integrity community: duplication, retouching, and cleaning. Using this library and realistic scientific images, we create a large scientific forgery image benchmark (39,423 images) with an enriched ground-truth. In addition, concerned about the high number of retracted papers due to image duplication, this work evaluates the state-of-the-art copy-move detection methods in the proposed dataset, using a new metric that asserts consistent match detection between the source and the copied region. The dataset and source-code will be freely available upon acceptance of the paper.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2021.

Builds on

3 of 38 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 154
  2. 2018Image Provenance Analysis at Scalecited by 16
  3. 2020Scientific Image Tampering Detection Based On Noise Inconsistencies: A Method And Datasetscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.