Benchmarking Scientific Image Forgery Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The scientific image integrity area presents a challenging research bottleneck, the lack of available datasets to design and evaluate forensic techniques. Its data sensitivity creates a legal hurdle that prevents one to rely on real tampered cases to build any sort of accessible forensic benchmark. To mitigate this bottleneck, we present an extendable open-source library that reproduces the most common image forgery operations reported by the research integrity community: duplication, retouching, and cleaning. Using this library and realistic scientific images, we create a large scientific forgery image benchmark (39,423 images) with an enriched ground-truth. In addition, concerned about the high number of retracted papers due to image duplication, this work evaluates the state-of-the-art copy-move detection methods in the proposed dataset, using a new metric that asserts consistent match detection between the source and the copied region. The dataset and source-code will be freely available upon acceptance of the paper.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2021.
Builds on
3 of 38 references.
References · 3
- 2018Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 154
- 2018Image Provenance Analysis at Scalecited by 16
- 2020Scientific Image Tampering Detection Based On Noise Inconsistencies: A Method And Datasetscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.