HIN-RNN: A Graph Representation Learning Neural Network for Fraudster Group Detection With No Handcrafted Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social reviews are indispensable resources for modern consumers' decision making. For financial gain, companies pay fraudsters preferably in groups to demote or promote products and services since consumers are more likely to be misled by a large number of similar reviews from groups. Recent approaches on fraudster group detection employed handcrafted features of group behaviors without considering the semantic relation between reviews from the reviewers in a group. In this paper, we propose the first neural approach, HIN-RNN, a Heterogeneous Information Network (HIN) Compatible RNN for fraudster group detection that requires no handcrafted features. HIN-RNN provides a unifying architecture for representation learning of each reviewer, with the initial vector as the sum of word embeddings of all review text written by the same reviewer, concatenated by the ratio of negative reviews. Given a co-review network representing reviewers who have reviewed the same items with the same ratings and the reviewers' vector representation, a collaboration matrix is acquired through HIN-RNN training. The proposed approach is confirmed to be effective with marked improvement over state-of-the-art approaches on both the Yelp (22% and 12% in terms of recall and F1-value, respectively) and Amazon (4% and 2% in terms of recall and F1-value, respectively) datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2021.
Builds on
11 of 46 references.
References · 11
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 413
- 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 322
- 2019Attributed Graph Clustering: A Deep Attentional Embedding Approachcited by 149
- 2019Spam Review Detection with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 57
- 2017The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms racecited by 49
- 2017Automated Crowdturfing Attacks and Defenses in Online Review Systemscited by 14
- 2017NetSpam: a Network-based Spam Detection Framework for Reviews in Online Social Mediacited by 3
- 2020DFraud3- Multi-Component Fraud Detection freeof Cold-startcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2023Graph Mining for Cybersecurity: A Surveycited by 5
- 2022Spatio-Temporal Graph Representation Learning for Fraudster Group Detectioncited by 3
- 2026HiSE: A Lightweight Hierarchical Semantic Explainer for Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026A Data-Driven Multimodal Method for Early Detection of Coordinated Abnormal Behaviors in Live-Streaming Platformscited by 0
- 2026A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Models12 Sep 2026
- 2026A Data-Driven Multimodal Method for Early Detection of Coordinated Abnormal Behaviors in Live-Streaming Platforms30 Aug 2026
- 2026HiSE: A Lightweight Hierarchical Semantic Explainer for Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks2 Jun 2026
- 2023Graph Mining for Cybersecurity: A Survey2 Apr 2023
- 2022Spatio-Temporal Graph Representation Learning for Fraudster Group Detection7 Jan 2022