An Interpretable Approach to Automated Severity Scoring in Pelvic Trauma
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pelvic ring disruptions result from blunt injury mechanisms and are often found in patients with multi-system trauma. To grade pelvic fracture severity in trauma victims based on whole-body CT, the Tile AO/OTA classification is frequently used. Due to the high volume of whole-body trauma CTs generated in busy trauma centers, an automated approach to Tile classification would provide substantial value, e.,g., to prioritize the reading queue of the attending trauma radiologist. In such scenario, an automated method should perform grading based on a transparent process and based on interpretable features to enable interaction with human readers and lower their workload by offering insights from a first automated read of the scan. This paper introduces an automated yet interpretable pelvic trauma decision support system to assist radiologists in fracture detection and Tile grade classification. The method operates similarly to human interpretation of CT scans and first detects distinct pelvic fractures on CT with high specificity using a Faster-RCNN model that are then interpreted using a structural causal model based on clinical best practices to infer an initial Tile grade. The Bayesian causal model and finally, the object detector are then queried for likely co-occurring fractures that may have been rejected initially due to the highly specific operating point of the detector, resulting in an updated list of detected fractures and corresponding final Tile grade. Our method is transparent in that it provides finding location and type using the object detector, as well as information on important counterfactuals that would invalidate the system's recommendation and achieves an AUC of 83.3%/85.1% for translational/rotational instability. Despite being designed for human-machine teaming, our approach does not compromise on performance compared to previous black-box approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2021.
Builds on
8 of 29 references.
References · 8
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
- 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 209
- 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
- 2018Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generationcited by 144
- 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135
- 2020Domain aware medical image classifier interpretation by counterfactual impact analysiscited by 17
- 2018Detection of distal radius fractures trained by a small set of X-ray images and Faster R-CNNcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspectivecited by 22
- 2022A Review of Causality for Learning Algorithms in Medical Image Analysiscited by 18
- 2023The role of causality in explainable artificial intelligencecited by 17
- 2024An Intrinsically Explainable Approach to Detecting Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans via Neurosymbolic Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Causal Transfer in Medical Image Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Causal Transfer in Medical Image Analysis25 Mar 2026
- 2024An Intrinsically Explainable Approach to Detecting Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans via Neurosymbolic Modeling23 Dec 2024
- 2023The role of causality in explainable artificial intelligence18 Sep 2023
- 2022A Review of Causality for Learning Algorithms in Medical Image Analysis11 Jun 2022
- 2021The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective4 Aug 2021