mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data Curation and Quality Assurance for Machine Learning-based Cyber Intrusion Detection

arXiv 2105.10041 ↗First posted 20 May 2021cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intrusion detection is an essential task in the cyber threat environment. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have been applied for intrusion detection. However, most of the existing research focuses on the model work but ignores the fact that poor data quality has a direct impact on the performance of a machine learning system. More attention should be paid to the data work when building a machine learning-based intrusion detection system. This article first summarizes existing machine learning-based intrusion detection systems and the datasets used for building these systems. Then the data preparation workflow and quality requirements for intrusion detection are discussed. To figure out how data and models affect machine learning performance, we conducted experiments on 11 HIDS datasets using seven machine learning models and three deep learning models. The experimental results show that BERT and GPT were the best algorithms for HIDS on all of the datasets. However, the performance on different datasets varies, indicating the differences between the data quality of these datasets. We then evaluate the data quality of the 11 datasets based on quality dimensions proposed in this paper to determine the best characteristics that a HIDS dataset should possess in order to yield the best possible result. This research initiates a data quality perspective for researchers and practitioners to improve the performance of machine learning-based intrusion detection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2021.

Builds on

9 of 68 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  3. 2019A Survey of Network-based Intrusion Detection Data Setscited by 46
  4. 2017BoostClean: Automated Error Detection and Repair for Machine Learningcited by 23
  5. 2018Benchmarking datasets for Anomaly-based Network Intrusion Detection: KDD CUP 99 alternativescited by 18
  6. 2018Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection and Categorization in Multi-cloud Environmentscited by 6
  7. 2019CAMLPAD: Cybersecurity Autonomous Machine Learning Platform for Anomaly Detectioncited by 2
  8. 2020Knowledge Graph semantic enhancement of input data for improving AIcited by 2
  9. 2017Sequence Covering for Efficient Host-Based Intrusion Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.