mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Case Study on Pros and Cons of Regular Expression Detection and Dependency Parsing for Negation Extraction from German Medical Documents. Technical Report

arXiv 2105.09702 ↗First posted 20 May 2021cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We describe our work on information extraction in medical documents written in German, especially detecting negations using an architecture based on the UIMA pipeline. Based on our previous work on software modules to cover medical concepts like diagnoses, examinations, etc. we employ a version of the NegEx regular expression algorithm with a large set of triggers as a baseline. We show how a significantly smaller trigger set is sufficient to achieve similar results, in order to reduce adaptation times to new text types. We elaborate on the question whether dependency parsing (based on the Stanford CoreNLP model) is a good alternative and describe the potentials and shortcomings of both approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2021.

Builds on

3 of 50 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  2. 2017NegBio: a high-performance tool for negation and uncertainty detection in radiology reportscited by 79
  3. 2020Clinical Text Summarization with Syntax-Based Negation and Semantic Concept Identificationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.