mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalizing Non-Punctuality for Timed Temporal Logic with Freeze Quantifiers

arXiv 2105.09534 ↗First posted 20 May 2021cs.LOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) and Timed Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL) are prominent real-time extensions of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). In general, the satisfiability checking problem for these extensions is undecidable when both the future U and the past S modalities are used. In a classical result, the satisfiability checking for MITL[U,S], a non punctual fragment of MTL[U,S], is shown to be decidable with EXPSPACE complete complexity. Given that this notion of non punctuality does not recover decidability in the case of TPTL[U,S], we propose a generalization of non punctuality called non adjacency for TPTL[U,S], and focus on its 1-variable fragment, 1-TPTL[U,S]. While non adjacent 1-TPTL[U,S] appears to be be a very small fragment, it is strictly more expressive than MITL. As our main result, we show that the satisfiability checking problem for non adjacent 1-TPTL[U,S] is decidable with EXPSPACE complete complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.