mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Query Interpretations from Entity-Linked Segmentations

arXiv 2105.08581 ↗First posted 18 May 2021cs.IR cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Web search queries can be ambiguous: is "source of the nile" meant to find information on the actual river or on a board game of that name? We tackle this problem by deriving entity-based query interpretations: given some query, the task is to derive all reasonable ways of linking suitable parts of the query to semantically compatible entities in a background knowledge base. Our suggested approach focuses on effectiveness but also on efficiency since web search response times should not exceed some hundreds of milliseconds. In our approach, we use query segmentation as a pre-processing step that finds promising segment-based "interpretation skeletons". The individual segments from these skeletons are then linked to entities from a knowledge base and the reasonable combinations are ranked in a final step. An experimental comparison on a combined corpus of all existing query entity linking datasets shows our approach to have a better interpretation accuracy at a better run time than the previously most effective methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2021.

Builds on

5 of 67 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020REL: An Entity Linker Standing on the Shoulders of Giantscited by 61
  2. 2016Joint Learning of the Embedding of Words and Entities for Named Entity Disambiguationcited by 48
  3. 2017Implicit Entity Linking in Tweetscited by 3
  4. 2013Query Segmentation for Relevance Ranking in Web Searchcited by 1
  5. 2019"The Michael Jordan of Greatness": Extracting Vossian Antonomasia from Two Decades of the New York Times, 1987-2007cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.