Quantitative and Approximate Monitoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In runtime verification, a monitor watches a trace of a system and, if possible, decides after observing each finite prefix whether or not the unknown infinite trace satisfies a given specification. We generalize the theory of runtime verification to monitors that attempt to estimate numerical values of quantitative trace properties (instead of attempting to conclude boolean values of trace specifications), such as maximal or average response time along a trace. Quantitative monitors are approximate: with every finite prefix, they can improve their estimate of the infinite trace's unknown property value. Consequently, quantitative monitors can be compared with regard to a precision-cost trade-off: better approximations of the property value require more monitor resources, such as states (in the case of finite-state monitors) or registers, and additional resources yield better approximations. We introduce a formal framework for quantitative and approximate monitoring, show how it conservatively generalizes the classical boolean setting for monitoring, and give several precision-cost trade-offs for monitors. For example, we prove that there are quantitative properties for which every additional register improves monitoring precision.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Monitoring Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 8
- 2023Monitoring Algorithmic Fairness under Partial Observationscited by 7
- 2025Monitoring of Static Fairnesscited by 0
- 2025Monitoring of Static Fairness3 Jul 2025
- 2023Monitoring Algorithmic Fairness under Partial Observations1 Aug 2023
- 2023Monitoring Algorithmic Fairness25 May 2023