Robust Physics-Based Manipulation by Interleaving Open and Closed-Loop Execution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a planning and control framework for physics-based manipulation under uncertainty. The key idea is to interleave robust open-loop execution with closed-loop control. We derive robustness metrics through contraction theory. We use these metrics to plan trajectories that are robust to both state uncertainty and model inaccuracies. However, fully robust trajectories are extremely difficult to find or may not exist for many multi-contact manipulation problems. We separate a trajectory into robust and non-robust segments through a minimum cost path search on a robustness graph. Robust segments are executed open-loop and non-robust segments are executed with model-predictive control. We conduct experiments on a real robotic system for reaching in clutter. Our results suggest that the open and closed-loop approach results in up to 35% more real-world success compared to open-loop baselines and a 40% reduction in execution time compared to model-predictive control. We show for the first time that partially open-loop manipulation plans generated with our approach reach similar success rates to model-predictive control, while achieving a more fluent/real-time execution. A video showing real-robot executions can be found at https://youtu.be/rPOPCwHfV4g.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.
- 2022Multi-Object Grasping in the Planecited by 5
- 2022Learning to Efficiently Plan Robust Frictional Multi-Object Graspscited by 5
- 2022Learning to Efficiently Plan Robust Frictional Multi-Object Grasps13 Oct 2022
- 2022Multi-Object Grasping in the Plane1 Jun 2022