A Measure of Research Taste
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Researchers are often evaluated by citation-based metrics. Such metrics can inform hiring, promotion, and funding decisions. Concerns have been expressed that popular citation-based metrics incentivize researchers to maximize the production of publications. Such incentives may not be optimal for scientific progress. Here we present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste: the researcher's ability to focus on impactful contributions. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity, thus incentivizing researchers to consider whether a publication is a useful addition to the literature. CAP is simple, interpretable, and parameter-free. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics, using a corpus of millions of publications and hundreds of millions of citations with yearly temporal granularity. CAP produces qualitatively plausible outcomes and has a number of advantages over prior metrics. Results can be explored at https://cap-measure.org/
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2021.
Builds on
11 of 67 references.
References · 11
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholarcited by 118
- 2013Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impactcited by 28
- 2019OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarshipcited by 16
- 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorscited by 14
- 2017A Century of Science: Globalization of Scientific Collaborations, Citations, and Innovationscited by 13
- 2015Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in sciencecited by 11
- 2013Reputation and Impact in Academic Careerscited by 7
- 2014Principles of scientific research team formation and evolutioncited by 7
- 2019Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approachescited by 3
- 2021The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024A Network Analysis Approach to Conlang Research Literature22 Jul 2024