Calibrating sufficiently
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When probabilistic classifiers are trained and calibrated, the so-called grouping loss component of the calibration loss can easily be overlooked. Grouping loss refers to the gap between observable information and information actually exploited in the calibration exercise. We investigate the relation between grouping loss and the concept of sufficiency, identifying comonotonicity as a useful criterion for sufficiency. We revisit the probing reduction approach of Langford & Zadrozny (2005) and find that it produces an estimator of probabilistic classifiers that reduces grouping loss. Finally, we discuss Brier curves as tools to support training and 'sufficient' calibration of probabilistic classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2021.
Builds on
6 of 68 references.
References · 6
- 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
- 2015Of Quantiles and Expectiles: Consistent Scoring Functions, Choquet Representations, and Forecast Rankingscited by 28
- 2018A Generalized Neyman-Pearson Criterion for Optimal Domain Adaptationcited by 22
- 2018Generic Conditions for Forecast Dominancecited by 13
- 2018A plug-in approach to maximising precision at the top and recall at the topcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2022Class Prior Estimation under Covariate Shift: No Problem?cited by 10
- 2023Isotonic Recalibration under a Low Signal-to-Noise Ratiocited by 7
- 2023Sparse joint shift in multinomial classificationcited by 5
- 2021Minimising quantifier variance under prior probability shiftcited by 4
- 2022Factorizable Joint Shift in Multinomial Classificationcited by 4
- 2023Invariance assumptions for class distribution estimationcited by 3
- 2025On the Interconnections of Calibration, Quantification, and Classifier Accuracy Prediction under Dataset Shiftcited by 2
- 2025Recalibrating binary probabilistic classifierscited by 1
- 2026Factorizable joint shift revisitedcited by 0
- 2026Decomposing Probabilistic Scores: Reliability, Information Loss and Uncertaintycited by 0
- 2026Decomposing Probabilistic Scores: Reliability, Information Loss and Uncertainty16 Mar 2026
- 2026Factorizable joint shift revisited21 Jan 2026
- 2025Recalibrating binary probabilistic classifiers25 May 2025
- 2025On the Interconnections of Calibration, Quantification, and Classifier Accuracy Prediction under Dataset Shift16 May 2025
- 2023Invariance assumptions for class distribution estimation28 Nov 2023
- 2023Sparse joint shift in multinomial classification29 Mar 2023
- 2023Isotonic Recalibration under a Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio6 Jan 2023
- 2022Factorizable Joint Shift in Multinomial Classification29 Jul 2022
- 2022Class Prior Estimation under Covariate Shift: No Problem?6 Jun 2022
- 2021Minimising quantifier variance under prior probability shift17 Jul 2021