mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Providing Assurance and Scrutability on Shared Data and Machine Learning Models with Verifiable Credentials

arXiv 2105.06370 ↗First posted 13 May 2021cs.LG cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adopting shared data resources requires scientists to place trust in the originators of the data. When shared data is later used in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems or machine learning (ML) models, the trust lineage extends to the users of the system, typically practitioners in fields such as healthcare and finance. Practitioners rely on AI developers to have used relevant, trustworthy data, but may have limited insight and recourse. This paper introduces a software architecture and implementation of a system based on design patterns from the field of self-sovereign identity. Scientists can issue signed credentials attesting to qualities of their data resources. Data contributions to ML models are recorded in a bill of materials (BOM), which is stored with the model as a verifiable credential. The BOM provides a traceable record of the supply chain for an AI system, which facilitates on-going scrutiny of the qualities of the contributing components. The verified BOM, and its linkage to certified data qualities, is used in the AI Scrutineer, a web-based tool designed to offer practitioners insight into ML model constituents and highlight any problems with adopted datasets, should they be found to have biased data or be otherwise discredited.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2021.

Builds on

16 of 64 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  2. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  4. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  5. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  6. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 165
  7. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  8. 2019Garbage In, Garbage Out? Do Machine Learning Application Papers in Social Computing Report Where Human-Labeled Training Data Comes From?cited by 64
  9. 2021Privacy and Trust Redefined in Federated Machine Learningcited by 13
  10. 2019Towards Traceability in Data Ecosystems using a Bill of Materials Modelcited by 12
  11. 2018Packaging and Sharing Machine Learning Models via the Acumos AI Open Platformcited by 7
  12. 2021A framework for fostering transparency in shared artificial intelligence models by increasing visibility of contributionscited by 5
4 more
  1. 2015Defending against Sybil Devices in Crowdsourced Mapping Servicescited by 4
  2. 2020Measurement in AI Policy: Opportunities and Challengescited by 4
  3. 2020Certifying Provenance of Scientific Datasets with Self-sovereign Identity and Verifiable Credentialscited by 2
  4. 2019Full-text Search for Verifiable Credential Metadata on Distributed Ledgerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.