Could you give me a hint? Generating inference graphs for defeasible reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Defeasible reasoning is the mode of reasoning where conclusions can be overturned by taking into account new evidence. A commonly used method in cognitive science and logic literature is to handcraft argumentation supporting inference graphs. While humans find inference graphs very useful for reasoning, constructing them at scale is difficult. In this paper, we automatically generate such inference graphs through transfer learning from another NLP task that shares the kind of reasoning that inference graphs support. Through automated metrics and human evaluation, we find that our method generates meaningful graphs for the defeasible inference task. Human accuracy on this task improves by 20% by consulting the generated graphs. Our findings open up exciting new research avenues for cases where machine reasoning can help human reasoning. (A dataset of 230,000 influence graphs for each defeasible query is located at: https://tinyurl.com/defeasiblegraphs.)
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2021.
Builds on
3 of 20 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
10 papers.
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
- 2023Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?cited by 249
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)cited by 170
- 2022Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense Learnerscited by 160
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Surveycited by 61
- 2023NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Normscited by 60
- 2021Think about it! Improving defeasible reasoning by first modeling the question scenariocited by 20
- 2025Graph-Grounded LLMs: Leveraging Graphical Function Calling to Minimize LLM Hallucinationscited by 4
- 2025LOGicalThought: Logic-Based Ontological Grounding of LLMs for High-Assurance Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025Language Models, Graph Searching, and Supervision Adulteration: When More Supervision is Less and How to Make More Morecited by 3
- 2025LOGicalThought: Logic-Based Ontological Grounding of LLMs for High-Assurance Reasoning2 Oct 2025
- 2025Graph-Grounded LLMs: Leveraging Graphical Function Calling to Minimize LLM Hallucinations13 Mar 2025
- 2025Language Models, Graph Searching, and Supervision Adulteration: When More Supervision is Less and How to Make More More13 Mar 2025
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)31 Dec 2024
- 2023NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Norms26 May 2023
- 2023Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?17 May 2023
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey26 Mar 2023
- 2022Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense Learners13 Oct 2022
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Survey1 Nov 2021
- 2021Think about it! Improving defeasible reasoning by first modeling the question scenario24 Oct 2021