Learning Runge-Kutta Integration Schemes for ODE Simulation and Identification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deriving analytical solutions of ordinary differential equations is usually restricted to a small subset of problems and numerical techniques are considered. Inevitably, a numerical simulation of a differential equation will then always be distinct from a true analytical solution. An efficient integration scheme shall further not only provide a trajectory throughout a given state, but also be derived to ensure the generated simulation to be close to the analytical one. Consequently, several integration schemes were developed for different classes of differential equations. Unfortunately, when considering the integration of complex non-linear systems, as well as the identification of non-linear equations from data, this choice of the integration scheme is often far from being trivial. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to learn integration schemes that minimize an integration-related cost function. We demonstrate the relevance of the proposed learning-based approach for non-linear equations and include a quantitative analysis w.r.t. classical state-of-the-art integration techniques, especially where the latter may not apply.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2021.
Builds on
8 of 47 references.
References · 8
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2017Deep Learning for Physical Processes: Incorporating Prior Scientific Knowledgecited by 96
- 2018Multistep Neural Networks for Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 89
- 2019ANODE: Unconditionally Accurate Memory-Efficient Gradients for Neural ODEscited by 84
- 2020Large-scale Neural Solvers for Partial Differential Equationscited by 17
- 2019ANODEV2: A Coupled Neural ODE Evolution Frameworkcited by 12
- 2017Bilinear residual Neural Network for the identification and forecasting of dynamical systemscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Machine learning with data assimilation and uncertainty quantification for dynamical systems: a reviewcited by 75
- 2022A posteriori learning for quasi-geostrophic turbulence parametrizationcited by 36
- 2022Bounded nonlinear forecasts of partially observed geophysical systems with physics-constrained deep learningcited by 5
- 2023Algorithmically Designed Artificial Neural Networks (ADANNs): Higher order deep operator learning for parametric partial differential equationscited by 1
- 2023Machine learning with data assimilation and uncertainty quantification for dynamical systems: a review18 Mar 2023
- 2023Algorithmically Designed Artificial Neural Networks (ADANNs): Higher order deep operator learning for parametric partial differential equations7 Feb 2023
- 2022A posteriori learning for quasi-geostrophic turbulence parametrization8 Apr 2022
- 2022Bounded nonlinear forecasts of partially observed geophysical systems with physics-constrained deep learning11 Feb 2022