Surrogate assisted active subspace and active subspace assisted surrogate -- A new paradigm for high dimensional structural reliability analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performing reliability analysis on complex systems is often computationally expensive. In particular, when dealing with systems having high input dimensionality, reliability estimation becomes a daunting task. A popular approach to overcome the problem associated with time-consuming and expensive evaluations is building a surrogate model. However, these computationally efficient models often suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Hence, training a surrogate model for high-dimensional problems is not straightforward. Henceforth, this paper presents a framework for solving high-dimensional reliability analysis problems. The basic premise is to train the surrogate model on a low-dimensional manifold, discovered using the active subspace algorithm. However, learning the low-dimensional manifold using active subspace is non-trivial as it requires information on the gradient of the response variable. To address this issue, we propose using sparse learning algorithms in conjunction with the active subspace algorithm; the resulting algorithm is referred to as the sparse active subspace (SAS) algorithm. We project the high-dimensional inputs onto the identified low-dimensional manifold identified using SAS. A high-fidelity surrogate model is used to map the inputs on the low-dimensional manifolds to the output response. We illustrate the efficacy of the proposed framework by using three benchmark reliability analysis problems from the literature. The results obtained indicate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approach compared to already established reliability analysis methods in the literature.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2021.
Builds on
6 of 78 references.
References · 6
- 2020Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural networkcited by 68
- 2015Polynomial-Chaos-based Krigingcited by 21
- 2019A Gaussian process latent force model for joint input-state estimation in linear structural systemscited by 18
- 2018Structured Bayesian Gaussian process latent variable model: applications to data-driven dimensionality reduction and high-dimensional inversioncited by 9
- 2020Simulation free reliability analysis: A physics-informed deep learning based approachcited by 8
- 2019Deep active subspaces - a scalable method for high-dimensional uncertainty propagationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Deep Capsule Encoder-Decoder Network for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 2
- 2023Enhanced multi-fidelity modelling for digital twin and uncertainty quantificationcited by 2
- 2023A Bayesian framework for discovering interpretable Lagrangian of dynamical systems from datacited by 2
- 2024Harnessing physics-informed operators for high-dimensional reliability analysis problemscited by 1
- 2024Harnessing physics-informed operators for high-dimensional reliability analysis problems7 Sep 2024
- 2023A Bayesian framework for discovering interpretable Lagrangian of dynamical systems from data10 Oct 2023
- 2023Enhanced multi-fidelity modelling for digital twin and uncertainty quantification26 Jun 2023
- 2022Deep Capsule Encoder-Decoder Network for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification19 Jan 2022