Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay and Mortality Using Patient Vital Signs: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Patient monitoring is vital in all stages of care. We here report the development and validation of ICU length of stay and mortality prediction models. The models will be used in an intelligent ICU patient monitoring module of an Intelligent Remote Patient Monitoring (IRPM) framework that monitors the health status of patients, and generates timely alerts, maneuver guidance, or reports when adverse medical conditions are predicted. We utilized the publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database to extract ICU stay data for adult patients to build two prediction models: one for mortality prediction and another for ICU length of stay. For the mortality model, we applied six commonly used machine learning (ML) binary classification algorithms for predicting the discharge status (survived or not). For the length of stay model, we applied the same six ML algorithms for binary classification using the median patient population ICU stay of 2.64 days. For the regression-based classification, we used two ML algorithms for predicting the number of days. We built two variations of each prediction model: one using 12 baseline demographic and vital sign features, and the other based on our proposed quantiles approach, in which we use 21 extra features engineered from the baseline vital sign features, including their modified means, standard deviations, and quantile percentages. We could perform predictive modeling with minimal features while maintaining reasonable performance using the quantiles approach. The best accuracy achieved in the mortality model was approximately 89% using the random forest algorithm. The highest accuracy achieved in the length of stay model, based on the population median ICU stay (2.64 days), was approximately 65% using the random forest algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2021.
Builds on
2 of 23 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Event-Based Contrastive Learning for Medical Time Seriescited by 13
- 2023Graph-enabled Reinforcement Learning for Time Series Forecasting with Adaptive Intelligencecited by 5
- 2023Evaluating the Fairness of the MIMIC-IV Dataset and a Baseline Algorithm: Application to the ICU Length of Stay Predictioncited by 2
- 2025DeVisE: Behavioral Testing of Medical Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2021WildWood: a new Random Forest algorithmcited by 0
- 2026EHR-RAGp: Retrieval-Augmented Prototype-Guided Foundation Model for Electronic Health Recordscited by 0
- 2026Represent, Then Generate: Multimodal-Conditioned Time-Series Generation under Irregular Missingnesscited by 0
- 2026Represent, Then Generate: Multimodal-Conditioned Time-Series Generation under Irregular Missingness12 Aug 2026
- 2026EHR-RAGp: Retrieval-Augmented Prototype-Guided Foundation Model for Electronic Health Records12 May 2026
- 2025DeVisE: Behavioral Testing of Medical Large Language Models18 Jun 2025
- 2023Evaluating the Fairness of the MIMIC-IV Dataset and a Baseline Algorithm: Application to the ICU Length of Stay Prediction31 Dec 2023
- 2023Event-Based Contrastive Learning for Medical Time Series16 Dec 2023
- 2023Graph-enabled Reinforcement Learning for Time Series Forecasting with Adaptive Intelligence18 Sep 2023
- 2021WildWood: a new Random Forest algorithm16 Sep 2021