An Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity in Multi-Solution Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
More and more, optimization methods are used to find diverse solution sets. We compare solution diversity in multi-objective optimization, multimodal optimization, and quality diversity in a simple domain. We show that multiobjective optimization does not always produce much diversity, multimodal optimization produces higher fitness solutions, and quality diversity is not sensitive to genetic neutrality and creates the most diverse set of solutions. An autoencoder is used to discover phenotypic features automatically, producing an even more diverse solution set with quality diversity. Finally, we make recommendations about when to use which approach.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.
Builds on
6 of 29 references.
References · 6
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Robots that can adapt like animalscited by 204
- 2017Quality and Diversity Optimization: A Unifying Modular Frameworkcited by 113
- 2016Using Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations to Scale Up the Multi-dimensional Archive of Phenotypic Elites Algorithmcited by 66
- 2019Autonomous skill discovery with Quality-Diversity and Unsupervised Descriptorscited by 57
- 2017PlatEMO: A MATLAB Platform for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 41
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.