mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ExpMRC: Explainability Evaluation for Machine Reading Comprehension

arXiv 2105.04126 ↗First posted 10 May 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Achieving human-level performance on some of Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) datasets is no longer challenging with the help of powerful Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs). However, it is necessary to provide both answer prediction and its explanation to further improve the MRC system's reliability, especially for real-life applications. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark called ExpMRC for evaluating the explainability of the MRC systems. ExpMRC contains four subsets, including SQuAD, CMRC 2018, RACE^+, and C3 with additional annotations of the answer's evidence. The MRC systems are required to give not only the correct answer but also its explanation. We use state-of-the-art pre-trained language models to build baseline systems and adopt various unsupervised approaches to extract evidence without a human-annotated training set. The experimental results show that these models are still far from human performance, suggesting that the ExpMRC is challenging. Resources will be available through https://github.com/ymcui/expmrc

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  6. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  7. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  8. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  9. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  10. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
  11. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  12. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
12 more
  1. 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 301
  2. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  3. 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 266
  4. 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
  5. 2015The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representationscited by 108
  6. 2018A Span-Extraction Dataset for Chinese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 84
  7. 2019Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 81
  8. 2019Dynamically Fused Graph Network for Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 63
  9. 2016Gated-Attention Readers for Text Comprehensioncited by 37
  10. 2016Attention-over-Attention Neural Networks for Reading Comprehensioncited by 31
  11. 2016Text Understanding with the Attention Sum Reader Networkcited by 18
  12. 2019Evidence Sentence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.