mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Don't forget your classics: Systematizing 45 years of Ancestry for Security API Usability Recommendations

arXiv 2105.02031 ↗First posted 5 May 2021cs.CR cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Producing secure software is challenging. The poor usability of security APIs makes this even harder. Many recommendations have been proposed to support developers by improving the usability of cryptography libraries and APIs; rooted in wider best practice guidance in software engineering and API design. In this SLR, we systematize knowledge regarding these recommendations. We identify and analyze 65 papers spanning 45 years, offering a total of 883 recommendations.We undertake a thematic analysis to identify 7 core ways to improve usability of APIs. We find that most of the recommendations focus on helping API developers to construct and structure their code and make it more usable and easier for programmers to understand. There is less focus, however, on documentation, writing requirements, code quality assessment and the impact of organizational software development practices. By tracing and analyzing paper ancestry, we map how this knowledge becomes validated and translated over time.We find evidence that less than a quarter of all API usability recommendations are empirically validated, and that recommendations specific to usable security APIs lag even further behind in this regard.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 May 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.